Clearpost.online It's your post, so post it!

In 1955, the United States was entering the final stages of McCarthyism or the Second Red Scare. During this low point in American history, the US government looked high and low for co*munist spies. Entertainers, educators, government employees and union members were often viewed with suspicion, and many careers and lives were destroyed by the flimsiest of allegations. Congress, the FBI, and the US military, they all fueled the 20th century version of the Salem Witch trials, partly by encouraging Americans to look for co*munists in unsuspecting places.

In the short Armed Forces Information Film above, you can see the dynamic at work. Some co*munists were out in the open; however, others “worked more silently.” So how to find those hidden co*munists?

Not to worry, the US military had that covered. In 1955, the U.S. First Army Headquarters prepared a manual called How to Spot a co*munist. Later published in popular American magazines, the propaganda piece warned readers, “there is no fool-proof system in spotting a co*munist.” “U.S. co*munists co*e from all walks of life, profess all faiths, and exercise all trades and professions. In addition, the co*munist Party, USA, has made concerted efforts to go underground for the purpose of infiltration.” And yet the pamphlet adds, letting readers breathe a sigh of relief, “there are, fortunately, indications that may give him away. These indications are often subtle but always present, for the co*munist, by reason of his “faith” must act and talk along certain lines.” In short, you’ll know a co*munist not by how he walks, but how he talks. Asking citizens to beco*e literary critics for the sake of national security, the publication told readers to watch out for the following:

While a preference for long sentences is co*mon to most co*munist writing, a distinct vocabulary provides the more easily recognized feature of the “co*munist Language.” Even a superficial reading of an article written by a co*munist or a conversation with one will probably reveal the use of some of the following expressions: integrative thinking, vanguard, co*rade, hootenanny, chauvinism, book-burning, syncretistic faith, bourgeois-nationalism, jingoism, colonialism, hooliganism, ruling class, progressive, demagogy, dialectical, witch-hunt, reactionary, exploitation, oppressive, materialist.

This list, selected at random, could be extended almost indefinitely. While all of the above expressions are part of the English language, their use by co*munists is infinitely more frequent than by the general public…

Rather chillingly, the pamphlet also warned that co*munists revealed themselves if and when they talked about “McCarthyism,” “violation of civil rights,” “racial or religious discrimination” or “peace.” In other words, they were guilty if they suggested that the government was overstepping its bounds.

According to Corliss Lamont’s book, Freedom Is As Freedom Does, the First Army withdrew the pamphlet after Murray Kempton slammed it in The New York Post and The New York Times wrote its own scathing op-ed. In 1955, the press could take those risks. The year before, Joseph Welch had faced up to Joe McCarthy, asking with his immortal words, “Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?

Note: An earlier version of this post appeared our site in 2013.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newsletter, please find it here.

If you would like to support the mission of Open Culture, consider making a donation to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your contributions will help us continue providing the best free cultural and educational materials to learners everywhere. You can contribute through PayPal, Patreon, Venmo (@openculture) and Crypto. Thanks!

Related Content:

Read the CIA’s Simple Sabotage Field Manual: A Timeless Guide to Subverting Any Organization with “Purposeful Stupidity” (1944)

Bertolt Brecht Testifies Before the House Un-American Activities co*mittee (1947)

How the CIA Secretly Funded Abstract Expressionism During the Cold War